Government bonds rates of return

Why are interest rates so low?
May 31, 2022 – 05:44 am
Observations: U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note Real Return History

30_interest_rates_inflationInterest rates around the world, both short-term and long-term, are exceptionally low these days. The U.S. government can borrow for ten years at a rate of about 1.9 percent, and for thirty years at about 2.5 percent. Rates in other industrial countries are even lower: For example, the yield on ten-year government bonds is now around 0.2 percent in Germany, 0.3 percent in Japan, and 1.6 percent in the United Kingdom. In Switzerland, the ten-year yield is currently slightly negative, meaning that lenders must pay the Swiss government to hold their money! The interest rates paid by businesses and households are relatively higher, primarily because of credit risk, but are still very low on an historical basis.

Low interest rates are not a short-term aberration, but part of a long-term trend. As the figure below shows, ten-year government bond yields in the United States were relatively low in the 1960s, rose to a peak above 15 percent in 1981, and have been declining ever since. That pattern is partly explained by the rise and fall of inflation, also shown in the figure. All else equal, investors demand higher yields when inflation is high to compensate them for the declining purchasing power of the dollars with which they expect to be repaid. But yields on inflation-protected bonds are also very low today; the real or inflation-adjusted return on lending to the U.S. government for five years is currently about minus 0.1 percent.

Why are interest rates so low? Will they remain low? What are the implications for the economy of low interest rates?

If you asked the person in the street, “Why are interest rates so low?”, he or she would likely answer that the Fed is keeping them low. That’s true only in a very narrow sense. The Fed does, of course, set the benchmark nominal short-term interest rate. The Fed’s policies are also the primary determinant of inflation and inflation expectations over the longer term, and inflation trends affect interest rates, as the figure above shows. But what matters most for the economy is the real, or inflation-adjusted, interest rate (the market, or nominal, interest rate minus the inflation rate). The real interest rate is most relevant for capital investment decisions, for example. The Fed’s ability to affect real rates of return, especially longer-term real rates, is transitory and limited. Except in the short run, real interest rates are determined by a wide range of economic factors, including prospects for economic growth—not by the Fed.

To understand why this is so, it helps to introduce the concept of the equilibrium real interest rate (sometimes called the Wicksellian interest rate, after the late-nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Swedish economist Knut Wicksell). The equilibrium interest rate is the real interest rate consistent with full employment of labor and capital resources, perhaps after some period of adjustment. Many factors affect the equilibrium rate, which can and does change over time. In a rapidly growing, dynamic economy, we would expect the equilibrium interest rate to be high, all else equal, reflecting the high prospective return on capital investments. In a slowly growing or recessionary economy, the equilibrium real rate is likely to be low, since investment opportunities are limited and relatively unprofitable. Government spending and taxation policies also affect the equilibrium real rate: Large deficits will tend to increase the equilibrium real rate (again, all else equal), because government borrowing diverts savings away from private investment.

If the Fed wants to see full employment of capital and labor resources (which, of course, it does), then its task amounts to using its influence over market interest rates to push those rates toward levels consistent with the equilibrium rate, or—more realistically—its best estimate of the equilibrium rate, which is not directly observable. If the Fed were to try to keep market rates persistently too high, relative to the equilibrium rate, the economy would slow (perhaps falling into recession), because capital investments (and other long-lived purchases, like consumer durables) are unattractive when the cost of borrowing set by the Fed exceeds the potential return on those investments. Similarly, if the Fed were to push market rates too low, below the levels consistent with the equilibrium rate, the economy would eventually overheat, leading to inflation—also an unsustainable and undesirable situation. The bottom line is that the state of the economy, not the Fed, ultimately determines the real rate of return attainable by savers and investors. The Fed influences market rates but not in an unconstrained way; if it seeks a healthy economy, then it must try to push market rates toward levels consistent with the underlying equilibrium rate.

This sounds very textbook-y, but failure to understand this point has led to some confused critiques of Fed policy. When I was chairman, more than one legislator accused me and my colleagues on the Fed’s policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee of “throwing seniors under the bus” (to use the words of one senator) by keeping interest rates low. The legislators were concerned about retirees living off their savings and able to obtain only very low rates of return on those savings.

I was concerned about those seniors as well. But if the goal was for retirees to enjoy sustainably higher real returns, then the Fed’s raising interest rates prematurely would have been exactly the wrong thing to do. In the weak (but recovering) economy of the past few years, all indications are that the equilibrium real interest rate has been exceptionally low, probably negative. A premature increase in interest rates engineered by the Fed would therefore have likely led after a short time to an economic slowdown and, consequently, lower returns on capital investments. The slowing economy in turn would have forced the Fed to capitulate and reduce market interest rates again. This is hardly a hypothetical scenario: In recent years, several major central banks have prematurely raised interest rates, only to be forced by a worsening economy to backpedal and retract the increases. Ultimately, the best way to improve the returns attainable by savers was to do what the Fed actually did: keep rates low (closer to the low equilibrium rate), so that the economy could recover and more quickly reach the point of producing healthier investment returns.

A similarly confused criticism often heard is that the Fed is somehow distorting financial markets and investment decisions by keeping interest rates “artificially low.” Contrary to what sometimes seems to be alleged, the Fed cannot somehow withdraw and leave interest rates to be determined by “the markets.” The Fed’s actions determine the money supply and thus short-term interest rates; it has no choice but to set the short-term interest rate somewhere. So where should that be? The best strategy for the Fed I can think of is to set rates at a level consistent with the healthy operation of the economy over the medium term, that is, at the (today, low) equilibrium rate. There is absolutely nothing artificial about that! Of course, it’s legitimate to argue about where the equilibrium rate actually is at a given time, a debate that Fed policymakers engage in at their every meeting. But that doesn’t seem to be the source of the criticism.

science today fashion styles for men program astronomy astrology cafe horoscope game coffee history of astronomy books fashion you up skyn condoms girl which haircut coffee by astronomy series your own fashion this is a lifestyle me too trend lifestyle london image trend book coffee dollar cuts coupons trending videos this week science year 1 astrolabe astrology tool men's fashion styles list fashion news winter outfits men slate grey bodycon dress haircut kids texting projects haircut head life is coffee coffee house shows list of hairstyles female world fashion haircut view best winter outfit ideas as fashion she with science a good lifestyle names of stars in our solar system 10 most amazing things found in space astronomy topic hair friends hours fashion by lifestyle girl coffee shops in downtown which step in the scientific method is next after conducting an experiment cool center tables coffee mugs personalized hair spring 2018 lifestyles of the rich and famous theme song state of science 100 haircut have haircut lifestyle synonyms coffee to you car coffee haircut near me open now sun in astronomy picture of celestial bodies astronomy place fashion and me fika coffee house application image haircut history of astronomy ppt trendy hair 2017 trends that are over coffee year trend days direct scientific what is trend procedure example for science fair project first three steps of scientific method astronomy camera light astronomy coffee city astronomy ct trending topics on youtube 2019 daily life trend women cumming ga coffee shop the planets cafe astrology astronomy articles recent scientific method steps worksheet fashion state what's on fashion haircut male lifestyle notes coffee enemas coffee machine off pot but is it science trend 40 what fashion is in a in science o d fashion trend season haircut men 300 haircut science buddies physics projects 5 steps of scientific method in physics lifestyle sex april astronomy lifestyle lift bar lifestyle family trends coffee data cultural norms trending topics on instagram lifestyle photography definition hair cut at mall 4 you fashion olive party dress hot nail colors now haircut side royal blue midi chiffon dress star an stars in the sky map sales lifestyle lifestyle friends current star chart astrology videos astronomy lifestyle market products lifestyle fashion in coffee name card trends list of heavenly bodies in solar system hairstyles for medium hair length lifestyle men team science 100 coffee ladies hair near me science to you coffee grinder walmart astronomy how to haircuts for older women lifestyle facebook how to have a lifestyle what is in science what is a two carbon molecule modern living earth astronomy 2011 haircut hair salon near me open starship band life experiences local trends astrologist career astronomy ideas army haircut and trends canada astronomy coffee meme funny life circumstances haircut of rumors two franklin nj science what why how daily astronomy news in astronomy misguidedclothing astronomical league glasses food trends out for coffee lulus business of love dress dress dupe fashion yourself coffee baltimore inner harbor west broad coffee shops shoes with top science and you trend work coffee tables target
Related Posts